becoming

the trail of a family becoming

Six Sense

This demo — from Pattie Maes’ lab at MIT, spearheaded by Pranav Mistry — was the buzz of TED. It’s a wearable device with a projector that paves the way for profound interaction with our environment. Imagine “Minority Report” and then some.

Like it or not, I think this is going to happen soon. I won’t call it “Six Sense” though, since it still uses our 5 common senses to operate at its best.

Undoubtedly, in order for this to work, everything and everyone will be tagged. In terms of human relationships, this could create a huge problem — Relationships no longer need to be slowly evolved through interactions and shared experiences. Why should I trust that those tags correctly described the person in front of me when I barely know him first hand? Where are the spirit of exploration, the grace, the risk, and the inter-dependency required? Imagine how many otherwise potential relationships will be ditched when the meta-data displayed might not be something you are looking for at first glance…

As a consumer, this will prove to be an indispensible tool. One can always get the best price and best product at any place and at any time with this. Price-wise, the technology will surely benefit the mega-stores online where everything is sold much cheaper. Shopping in a physical building (e.g. buying books) will become unnecessary unless what you are purchasing is some kind of service (e.g. hair cut). And ironically, the price-comparison function of this tool will also become obsolete at the end, when there is no other shop to compare with.

Ultimately, what I want to ask is: If Sixth Sense can give us even more information about virtually anything at our finger tips (literally), don’t we have an all-the-more urgent need for a way to process them, to discern them?

Just what kind of advancement do we have in that area?

[link: TED]

Pictures from Vancouver Trip

Links to some pictures from our last trip to Vancouver.

  1. Deacon Ordination
  2. Others from the Trip

Enjoy!

Who watches the Watchmen?

The tagline from one of the most celebrated graphic novel of all times, Watchmen the movie is out right now and is receiving mixed reviews. I am not sure if I will watch it on the big silver screen, but I suggest, before you watch it, do yourself a favor and read the original graphic novel first. Watchmen is NOT a race-run-and-kill Hollywood blockbuster. It is a multi-layered story that is temporally intertwined. If the Dark Knight was about pure evil, Watchmen is about evil in reality. What if our whole fascination of super-heroes turns out to be nothing like that at all? What if they turn out to be just as bad? What if life is just as messy and broken for them and for us…

Who watches the Watchmen?

And,

Who will watch the Watchmen?

真好。

因著新的事奉崗位,我要搬office。新的地方需要大大小小的,搬搬抬抬、釘釘鑽鑽…

於是我請了一位壯士相助。

壯士,正是我爸爸。

那天,我們站在Ikea 的停車場外,抬著那塊大木板,在小小車箱外,左轉右轉半小時,最後望著那半點虛位也沒有的車子,我們流著的,除了熱汗,還有冷汗。

我想,他怎麼也不會想到,有一天竟然會為自己兒子的office 出一份力,

現在,每當我看見這房間的一切,我都會想,

我的爸爸,真好。

————-

另外,昨天早上,我的12箱書也要搬家了。有個弟兄,他老早就跟我說過:「我沒有甚麼懂得幫你,但搬搬抬抬,你一定要叫我…」

想起他的承諾,於是,我厚著面皮,打電話給他。

他二話不說,就來了。

我告訴 Pastor Jimmy:「世勇確是個好男人。」

真的,這樣不計較、不怕捱,樂於助人的心胸,

弟兄,你確是個好男人!

我選擇相信,這是新生。

我相信,其實我們當中,還有人分擔著,Karen這段話(我是其一)。

「恩典」和「團契」,從來都是祂的賜予;

當合起來的時候,就更是如此。

既是被賜予,就好好享受和回應,不要把它私有化。

可以為聚會結束而不捨,但更要因背後的神而放心。

one heart 同心

老友 Charis 和 Anson 的 One Body,歷4年之久終於出新碟,我當然要在此勁推!新碟 「one heart 同心」可在這裡試聽

第二次的歷史時刻

這次在溫哥華,造就了「第二次的歷史時刻」。這一次,我們都得出一個結論:blog 有必要繼續寫,因為 1)原來我們的blog 真係有人睇!2)我們正在將一些個別認識我們的朋友,連在一起,這是很有意義和重要的。

另外,比起上一次,我們的頭髮指數總和,是稍微高了一點。

[右至左:雜崩能的Alan,TheorySpace的Anson,和我]

又,我有必要在此謝謝我們的太太,沒有你們的「放人」,「歷史」是不可能重複的。

We become what we worship

Nijay Gupta’s very positive review of Greg Beale’s new book We Become What We Worship: A Biblical Theology of Idolatry (IVP, 2008).