We are not building an empire…
In one of the ending chapters, Peterson expressed what he sees as a positive change between his congregation and him, after he returned from a year of sabbatical leave:
A recent incident, seemingly trivial, illustrates the profound difference that keeps showing up in a variety of situations. About twenty-five of us were going on an overnight leadership retreat. We had agreed to meet in the church parking lot at 5:45 to car-pool together. I made a hostpotal visit that took longer than planned and arrived five minutes late — to an empty parking lot. They had left me. Before the sabbatical, that would never have happened; now that kind of thing happens all the time. They can take care of themselves and know that I can take care of myself. Maturity.
We are both, the congregation and I, experiencing a great freedom in this: neither of us neurotically needs each other. I am not dependent on them; they aren’t dependent on me. That leaves us free to appreciate each other and receive gifts of ministry from each other.
Eugene Peterson, The Gift — Reflections on Christian Ministry, p.151.
What do you think? How would you feel when something like that happened to you as a pastor? Reading Peterson’s words, and looking at how Apple’s share slump on Steve Job’s temporal medical leave, one has to wonder how counter-cultural pastoral work can be, and must be.
No, as pastors, we are not called to build an empire — at least not one that circles around ourselves. If your congregation cannot survive upon your departure or your extended leave of absence, it could only mean one thing — that those people have been following the wrong person all along.
May the neighbors’ words to the Samaritan woman be a constant reminder to all of us who are leading, shepherding and teaching:
We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world. (John 5.42)
Filed by edmund at 5.51 pm under Faith |
2 Comments
Anson
That is very true, there shouldn’t be any unhealthy co-dependency established a pastor and the congregants.
But what do you think about Anglican churches, where the priest is the only one who has authority to administer the sacraments? Can a congregation survive long without a priest doing those things only he can do?
Jan 16th, 2009
edmund
that is why in the Anglican church, there is such a thing as interim pastor. But still, the underlying rationale is that A priest in needed in every congregation, but that does not always means YOU. It is the role, not the person.
Jan 16th, 2009
Reply to “We are not building an empire…”